Associate
Albany, NY
phone (518) 438-9907 (Ext. 226)
fax (518) 438-9914
jcastiglione@youngsommer.com
Overview
Representative Matters

Joseph F. Castiglione primarily practices in the areas of commercial, contract, municipal, land-use, administrative and environmental law, with his practice primarily dedicated to litigation in State and Federal courts. He works with both municipal and private sector clients through all aspects of the litigation process, including developing strategy, formulating the necessary documents and papers to pursue or defend a matter, motion practice, disclosure, conducting relevant trial work including the trial, and handling all aspects of the appellate process. Mr. Castiglione works with multiple town boards, including zoning and planning boards, on town legislative and zoning issues, including working through the State Environmental Quality Review Act review process. Mr. Castiglione also works with many county and town entities in the eminent domain process when those municipalities are engaged in public use projects. Mr. Castiglione has also lectured about zoning and legislative issues before local municipal boards, and authored several articles on civil practice in New York State.
Bar Admissions
New York, 2004
U.S. District Court Northern District of New York, 2004
U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit, 2007
Supreme Court of the United States of America, 2009
Education
Albany Law School Union University, Albany, New York, 2003, J.D.
Honors: Cum Laude
Honors: Dean’s List, Spring 2000, Spring 2003
Law Journal: Albany Law School Journal of Science & Technology, Managing Editor of Research and Writing, 2002 – 2003
State University of New York, Plattsburgh, NY, 1999, B.A.
Major: Political Science
Published Works
“A Prevailing Party Can Still Be a “Sore” Winner on Appeal Under CPLR 5501(a)(1); Raising Alternative Arguments That Necessarily Affect the Final Judgment to Ensure Winning on Appeal”, Albany Law Review New York Appeals Annual Issue, 2010-2011
The Implications of Responding to Pleadings if a Motion to Dismiss is Denied, New York State Bar Association Journal, February, 2011
A “Moot Point” Is an Ongoing Concern for Everyone, New York State Bar Association Journal, February, 2010
Is the District Attorney a Permissible Guest at a “Pringle Hearing”?, New York State Bar Association Journal, May, 2009
Honors and Awards
Justinian Society
Professional Associations and Memberships
Mohawk Hudson Land Conservancy, 2004 – Present
Member Board of Directors 2004-2011; Treasurer 2009, 2010
New York State Bar Association, Member
Albany County Bar Association, Member
Past Employment Positions
New York State Senate, Legislative Director, 2000
Legal Assistant Information
Jodi L. Barnes, 518-438-9907 x. 240
jbarnes@youngsommer.com
Fleming v. New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection, 66 A.D.3d 777 (2d Dept. 2009)
The firm represented the developer-respondent, RFB, LLC. RFB and its contract-seller Kent Acres Development Co.,Ltd., who proposed to construct an approximately 280 residential condominium development… Read More
Kent Acres Development Co., Ltd., v. City of New York, 41 AD3d 542 (2d Dept. 2007)
The firm represented Lexington Realty Development Corp. and RFB, LLC in obtaining a judgment directing the Town of Kent to allow the Developers to participate… Read More
Matter of Boro Recycling, Inc., v. The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, et al., Decision and Order dated April 8, 2011 (S.Ct. Kings Co. 2011) (Kings Co. Index No. 22559-10)
The firm represented Boro Recycling, Inc. (“Boro”). For approximately 26 years, Boro had been providing services exclusively to “dealers” and “distributors” of beer and carbonated… Read More
Matter of Stratis Contracting Corp., v. Town of Lewisboro, et al., 78 AD3d 1188, 911 NYS2d 667 (2d Dept 2010)
Village of Coxsackie v. Veolia Water North America – North East, LLC, Slip. Copy 2007, WL2667460 (N.D.N.Y 2007)
The firm represented the Village of Coxsackie (the “Village”) in a successful federal court action seeking to enforce a contract against a company hired to… Read More
Village of Delhi, et al. v. Town of Delhi, et al., 72 A.D.3d 1476 (3d Dept 2010)
The firm represented the Town of Delhi. The Village of Delhi commenced a combined CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment proceeding against the Town of… Read More
Worcester Creameries Corp. v. City of New York, 54 AD3d 87 (3d Dept. 2008)
The firm represented a Delaware County milk processing facility in its successful effort to compel New York City (the “City”) to pay for regulatory upgrades… Read More
