Joseph F. Castiglione

Associate

Albany, NY
phone (518) 438-9907 (Ext. 226)
fax (518) 438-9914
jcastiglione@youngsommer.com

Overview

Representative Matters

 
Joseph F. Castiglione

Joseph F. Castiglione primarily practices in the areas of commercial, contract, municipal, land-use, administrative and environmental law, with his practice primarily dedicated to litigation in State and Federal courts. He works with both municipal and private sector clients through all aspects of the litigation process, including developing strategy, formulating the necessary documents and papers to pursue or defend a matter, motion practice, disclosure, conducting relevant trial work including the trial, and handling all aspects of the appellate process. Mr. Castiglione works with multiple town boards, including zoning and planning boards, on town legislative and zoning issues, including working through the State Environmental Quality Review Act review process. Mr. Castiglione also works with many county and town entities in the eminent domain process when those municipalities are engaged in public use projects. Mr. Castiglione has also lectured about zoning and legislative issues before local municipal boards, and authored several articles on civil practice in New York State.

Bar Admissions

New York, 2004
U.S. District Court Northern District of New York, 2004
U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit, 2007
Supreme Court of the United States of America, 2009

Education

Albany Law School Union University, Albany, New York, 2003, J.D.
Honors: Cum Laude
Honors: Dean’s List, Spring 2000, Spring 2003
Law Journal: Albany Law School Journal of Science & Technology, Managing Editor of Research and Writing, 2002 – 2003

State University of New York, Plattsburgh, NY, 1999, B.A.
Major: Political Science

Published Works

“A Prevailing Party Can Still Be a “Sore” Winner on Appeal Under CPLR 5501(a)(1); Raising Alternative Arguments That Necessarily Affect the Final Judgment to Ensure Winning on Appeal”, Albany Law Review New York Appeals Annual Issue, 2010-2011

The Implications of Responding to Pleadings if a Motion to Dismiss is Denied, New York State Bar Association Journal, February, 2011

A “Moot Point” Is an Ongoing Concern for Everyone, New York State Bar Association Journal, February, 2010

Is the District Attorney a Permissible Guest at a “Pringle Hearing”?, New York State Bar Association Journal, May, 2009

Honors and Awards

Justinian Society

Professional Associations and Memberships

Mohawk Hudson Land Conservancy, 2004 – Present
Member Board of Directors 2004-2011; Treasurer 2009, 2010
New York State Bar Association, Member
Albany County Bar Association, Member

Past Employment Positions

New York State Senate, Legislative Director, 2000

Legal Assistant Information

Jodi L. Barnes, 518-438-9907 x. 240
jbarnes@youngsommer.com

Fleming v. New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection, 66 A.D.3d 777 (2d Dept. 2009)

The firm represented the developer-respondent, RFB, LLC. RFB and its contract-seller Kent Acres Development Co.,Ltd., who proposed to construct an approximately 280 residential condominium development… Read More

Kent Acres Development Co., Ltd., v. City of New York, 41 AD3d 542 (2d Dept. 2007)

The firm represented Lexington Realty Development Corp. and RFB, LLC in obtaining a judgment directing the Town of Kent to allow the Developers to participate… Read More

Matter of Boro Recycling, Inc., v. The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, et al., Decision and Order dated April 8, 2011 (S.Ct. Kings Co. 2011) (Kings Co. Index No. 22559-10)

The firm represented Boro Recycling, Inc. (“Boro”). For approximately 26 years, Boro had been providing services exclusively to “dealers” and “distributors” of beer and carbonated… Read More

Matter of Stratis Contracting Corp., v. Town of Lewisboro, et al., 78 AD3d 1188, 911 NYS2d 667 (2d Dept 2010)

Village of Coxsackie v. Veolia Water North America – North East, LLC, Slip. Copy 2007, WL2667460 (N.D.N.Y 2007)

The firm represented the Village of Coxsackie (the “Village”) in a successful federal court action seeking to enforce a contract against a company hired to… Read More

Village of Delhi, et al. v. Town of Delhi, et al., 72 A.D.3d 1476 (3d Dept 2010)

The firm represented the Town of Delhi. The Village of Delhi commenced a combined CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment proceeding against the Town of… Read More

Worcester Creameries Corp. v. City of New York, 54 AD3d 87 (3d Dept. 2008)

The firm represented a Delaware County milk processing facility in its successful effort to compel New York City (the “City”) to pay for regulatory upgrades… Read More